Starting on a job has made me revisit my notion of writing. This was a subject that had occupied a lot of my mindspace when studying journalism at the (under)graduate level. A journalist is keenly aware that the fruits of her writing are not her own. And I don’t mean the Barthes’ the-author-is-dead-esque sense of alienation from one’s writing. I mean the mundane realisation that writing is part of the job, and like the other parts, must be aligned to suit the employer’s need. The sub-editor will change the words, break the sentence, add punctuation, or even throw out a paragraph. Your thoughts will make way for an ad. I still remember the first word an editor changed in my story. I prided myself on stories that required no changes. And then, the word ‘idyllic’ was replaced by ‘relaxed’.

But these thoughts receded into the background once I came to TISS. In a sense, all my writing there was personal. The word limits allowed for a free run of verbosity. And while there was limited choice in the selection of topics to write on, I could spin it any way I wanted. Sure, you had to ‘attribute’ and ‘cite’, but that’s one thing I quickly learnt: with JSTOR at your service, you can justify and make any opinion sound reasoned and widely supported.

Last week, after a long time, I had occasion to write something to suit someone else’s parameters. And I found it strangely difficult to let go of the work. The subject wasn’t even opinion based, it was purely descriptive. But the piece came back to me for edits four times and I winced each time. That evening, I gave the matter some thought and decided it was like jetlag – my mental compass was yet to adjust to the new (again) landscape of professional writing. I’ve settled into it since.

And that made me wonder: now that I’m more or less certain of doing this for the next couple of years, isn’t there the risk of becoming so dispassionate about all writing that I lose my possessive side of personal writing? The amount I write for myself pales in comparison to what I’ll be churning out professionally. I shudder to think of the day when I don’t feel fiercely attached to what I write. It is a strange feeling. You don’t know you have it until someone comes along trying to change what you wrote. You never know how invested you are in your work till you run the risk of losing it. And to me, even the slightest change makes my writing, not mine.

Whose is it then?


5 thoughts on “writing

  1. Aj,
    Needless to say, I’ve been a chronic follower of your blog. Often than said, I find myself at a loss of words after reading your pieces, either lost in thought or because anything I say would be an insult to what I just read. See now, just what I meant!

    Keep writing.

    • Thanks, Ravi. Though I see writing as an intensely personal, even private experience at times, I can’t say words like these have no effect on my desire to write.

      • It is indeed beautiful that you almost equate it to spiritual/ physical arousal.
        The below article on rains raining, how rains rain and how they ought to almost drizzled my head there! That’s what I am talking about! *whistles*

  2. yeah, it’s always a struggle, isn’t it? i’m a firm believer of good editing and i edit everything in my head, even letters and the writing on jam jars. it’s taken me a while to accept that someone else may (not always, but i’ve been unfairly lucky) have better ideas to clarify what i’m saying than me, and it’s always a struggle, even if it does get easier every time (for me).

    i suppose it depends on what you call yours (i don’t mean it in the barthes-ian sense either) and how much that matters; your personal writing is always going to remain untouched and your feelings about it may not change, thusly. professional writing–or writing that goes out–is inevitably going to be touched up. that may not always be a bad thing though, and not always a ‘loss’? (i speak for myself, i think, haha)

    • I believe editing helps too. But it’s tricky ground to say the least. The line between making the content clearer and editing to reflect your notion of how something is presented is blurred and arbitrary. I understand formatting something to an organisational stylesheet,but editorial overreach makes me uncomfortable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s